Online and In-Studio Music Lessons in Dallas
Get Started Today! 888.862.7210
Ask Our Professionals

Copyright Information

Dallas Entertainment Lawyer Craig Crafton has graciously allowed us to reprint his articles about copyright issues. These should be of great benefit to our songwriters, composers, and musicians. There's more info about Craig at the bottom of the page.

How to Register a Copyright by Craig Crafton

We've recently discussed what a copyright is and when it is created, and what rights a copyright provides. But how do you register a copyright?

You register a copyright at http://www.copyright.gov/. That is the US Copyright Office website. There is no other website where you can personally register a copyright. Registration is $35 per submission (for songs a submission can be up to 80 minutes of songs by the same songwriters). Paper submission is now an $80 fee. All other websites are other companies trying to make money off you.

The copyright.gov website contains much good information that can be overwhelming and the registration interface is good, but still somewhat confusing. After completing the online registration form you can either upload or mail to the US Copyright Office a copy of the artist work being copyrighted, such as a cd or manuscript. For songs, the composition (PA copyright) and sound recording (SR copyright) can be done together, for one fee, or separately if the songwriter and recording artist are different.

Copyright registration serves two important purposes. The first is to establish a verifiable record of the date and content of an artistic work. Once the copyright of an artistic work is registered there is an official government record, that carries a presumption of accurateness, regarding when you created the artistic work.

The second reason is that copyright registration entitles the copyright holder of statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement in cases of copyright violation. In the case your artistic work is misappropriated the chance of recovery of substantial damages are much greater if the artistic work is formally copyrighted.

Remember, the registration of the copyright is not the same as the creation of the copyright. The registration is a formal method to put the world on notice of your copyright and secure the right to damages if your copyright is violated.

What about the poor-mans copyright - mailing a copy of your artistic work to someone who keeps the envelop sealed? It is not the same as registration. It may be evidence of a date of creation, based on the post-mark, but is not a verifiable government record. There is no notice to the world of your copyright. And most importantly, you would not be entitled to the statutory damages, but much lower common-law damages.

Next time I will discuss the duration of a copyright.

What is a Controlled Composition Clause? by Craig Crafton

Mechanical Royalties are moneys a songwriter receives when another artist records their song. But what happens to Mechanical Royalties when you record your own songs? If you are recording a song that you wrote, your label owes a Mechanical Royalty to your publisher for the use of the underlying song in a recording. However, almost all record companies include a contract clause called a "controlled composition clause" that reduces the Mechanical Royalty owed to 3/4 or 75% of the statutory rate.

A controlled composition is a song written, owned or controlled by the artist. A controlled composition clause reduces the Mechanical Royalty for a songwriter/ recording artist and its publisher on songs written or "controlled" by the artist. A controlled composition clause reduces the payment per song and limits the total number of songs on which Mechanical Royalties will be paid. The purpose of a controlled composition clause is to limit on how much a label pays as a Mechanical Royalty for each controlled composition.

How it works is a typical controlled composition clause that says the songwriter/artist will receive 3/4 of the minimum statutory mechanical rate payable on a maximum of 10 songs per album. Therefore, the Mechanical Royalty on the artist's entire album has a cap of $0.60 cents (3/4 rate x 10 songs). If the songwriter/artist writes 12 songs for the album, the artist's Mechanical Royalty share is $0.60 cents instead of $0.96 cents at the full rate.

Artists should attempt to negotiate a favorable rate under a controlled composition clause. Record companies bear the high cost and risk recording, marketing and developing songwriter/ recording artists and contend that artists should give them a break on the Mechanical Royalty the labels pay.

Next we take a look at music licensing for film and television and the synchronization license.

Who is Harry Fox? by Craig Crafton

Last time I discussed how Mechanical Royalties are moneys a songwriter receives when another artist records their song. When an underlying song (composition) is recorded and reproduced a Mechanical Royalty is owed to the owner of the underlying song (publisher and/or songwriter) for the use of the underlying song. The Mechanical Royalty is typically paid by the record label to the song writer or publisher for use of the underlying song in a recording. The same mechanical royalty applies for digital downloads (internet) or physical (cd or album) reproductions of a song.

If you are recording a song that you wrote, your label owes a Mechanical Royalty to your publisher (more on this in the next issue). If you record a cover version of a song that has already been recorded, you or your label must obtain a mechanical license and pay a Mechanical Royalty to the publisher/songwriter of the underling song.

Harry Fox Agency is a private company that issues mechanical licenses and collects mechanical royalties. Publishers or songwriters sign up with Harry Fox Agency. When a recording artist wants to record a song represented by Harry Fox Agency, the artist or label contacts Harry Fox Agency, who issues the mechanical license. The Harry Fox Agency then collects the Mechanical Royalty, for the use of the underlying song, and pays the publisher or songwriter.

That is how a songwriter gets paid for the use of his/her song when it is recorded. The Harry Fox Agency coordinates issuing Mechanical Licenses and collecting Mechanical Royalties. To record a song not listed with the Harry Fox Agency, a recording artist must contact the publisher or songwriter directly and obtain a mechanical license.

In the next Night Light newsletter I talk about what happens with Mechanical Royalties when you record your own songs.

How Does a Songwriter Get Paid When His/Her Song is Recorded? by Craig Crafton

Last time I discussed "what is a song" and explained that a song contains two distinct legal parts: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song.

The underlying song is notes on a page of written music, the composition or that thing created by the songwriter. There can be only one underlying song or composition. Every time an underlying song is performed the songwriter is entitled to a royalty, which is called a performance royalty or publishing royalty, typically collected by ASCAP or BMI, usually through a publisher who pays the songwriter. The recorded performance of the song is usually owned by the person paying for the recording - typically he label - who pays the performing artist a royalty based on sales of the recording. There can be many recorded performances an underlying song.

So how does a songwriter get paid for the use of his/her song when it is recorded by artists? This is the often misunderstood Mechanical Royalty. A bit of history: Before recorded music, in the early 1900s songs got popular on the vaudeville circuit. Musicians would buy the sheet music to perform songs. The sheet music was published by music publishers, who then paid the songwriter a percentage of the sheet music sales. Then player pianos were invented. Player pianos used a thick piece of paper punched with notches that caused the piano keys to play the song - a mechanical process. Live piano players were no longer necessary and sheet music wasn't being sold as much.

But the underlying song was being reproduced or performed by the piano scrolls used by player pianos. The publishers lobbied Congress and the Mechanical Royalty was created. The Mechanical Royalty was a royalty that the manufacturers of the piano scrolls were obligated to pay to publishers for use of the underlying song. When albums and tapes were invented, the mechanical royalty was extended to those formats, which were also mechanical reproductions (a needle in a groove and electrical current from tape to tape head). When cds were invented there was no mechanical process involved (only digital code), but in the 1980s, after much debate, the mechanical royalty was extended to cds. And the same thing happened with digital downloads.

When an underlying song is recorded and reproduced, in any format, a Mechanical Royalty is owed to the owner of the underlying song (publisher and/or songwriter) for the use of the underlying song. The Mechanical Royalty is typically paid by the record label to the song writer or publisher for use of the underlying song in a recording.

The amount of the mechanical royalty has increased over time and is now $.091 for songs 5 minutes or less, based on each recorded copy of the song. (17 US Code 115). The same mechanical royalty applies for digital downloads (internet) or physical (cd or album) reproductions of a song.

The Mechanical Royalty is somewhat difficult to grasp, but first understanding the different rights and royalties for an underlying song or composition and a recorded performance of a song is the first step. This is just a basic outline. Over the next several Night Light newsletters I will address more about Mechanical Royalties and other royalties that can provide revenue to songwriters, publishers and recordings artists.

What is A Song? by Craig Crafton

Music and lyrics? Melody and harmony? Rhythm and groove? Yes to all. But legally a song contains two distinct elements that implicate different rights, different royalties and different revenue streams. The two parts of a song are: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song.

There can be many recordings of a song, but only one underlying song or composition. For example, the song Help was written by Lennon/McCartney - they are the only songwriters and only Lennon/McCartney (or their publisher) will always own the underlying song or composition. However, there can be many recorded performances of Help by many bands, including the Beatles.

The underlying song is embodied by the notes on a page of written music but exists in a more metaphysical sense as the thing created by the songwriter. The underlying song is copyrighted by a form PA, which means performing arts. Every time the underlying song is performed, live on the radio, television, internet or other media, the songwriter is entitled to a royalty for the use of the song, which is called a performance royalty or publishing royalty. (17 USC 106) The performance or publishing royalty is typically collected by ASCAP or BMI, usually through a publisher who pays the songwriter.

The recorded performance of a song is a different copyright and different royalty. Unlike the underlying song, there can be many recorded performances of Help by many bands, including the Beatles. The recorded performance of the song is usually owned by the person paying for the recording - a music label or the recording artist if no label. The label pays the artist who records the song a royalty based on the sales of the recording, called a sales royalty or artist royalty. The amount of the sales or artist royalty is negotiated between the label and artist. A recorded performance is copyrighted on a form SR, which stands for Sound Recording.

That is just the basics. But the distinction between the underlying sound and recorded performance is the key to kinds of royalties that are paid, who pays, and who receives. Over the next several Night Light newsletters I will discuss these royalties and begin to paint a picture where the art, business and law of music combine.

Music in Movies, TV and Advertisements by Craig Crafton

Any time music is used in a movie, tv or advertisement two licenses are required:

Synchronization (synch) License: This license must be obtained from the songwriter or publisher (if the writer has assigned his/her rights to a publisher) of the composition. A Synch License gives the movie or tv producer the right to synchronize the composition (not the recording of the song, but the underlying composition - lyrics and melody) with the moving images in the movie, tv show or advertisement. The fee for a Synch License is negotiated between the movie or tv producer and the songwriter/publisher.

M aster Use License: The movie or tv producer also must obtain a license from the person that owns the copyright to the sound recording (found on a CD or download). Typically, a record label owns the sound recording copyright and thus holds the master use rights. If there is no label, the recording artist usually owns the master use right. The fee for a Master Use License is negotiated between the movie or tv producer and the label/recording artist.

So, for an artist/songwriter who has not assigned their publishing rights and self-releases their own record (without a label), the movie or tv producer negotiates "both sides" - the Synch License and Master Use License - with the artist/songwriter directly. If the artist has a publisher and a record deal, the movie or tv producer negotiates with the publisher for the Synch License and the label for the Master Use License. Either the label or the publisher/songwriter can refuse to grant a license and the recorded song then cannot be used.

The license fees paid by movie or tv producers is typically split between the publisher/songwriter for the synch rights and the label/recording artist for the master use rights. When the movie, tv show or advertisement containing the licensed song is publicly performed (broadcast on tv), a performance royalty is generated for the publisher/songwriter, typically collected by ASCAP or BMI. There is no performance royalty from public performance in movie theaters.

What do ASCAP and BMI do? by Craig Crafton

As we have talked about before, a song contains two distinct legal elements that implicate different rights, different royalties and different revenue streams: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song. The composition is embodied by the notes on a page of written music but exists in a more metaphysical sense as the thing created by the songwriter. There can be many recordings of a song, but only one composition. ASCAP and BMI are only concerned with the composition, and the rights, royalties and revenue generated by use (performance) of the composition.

ASCAP (American Society of Composers Arrangers and Producers) and BMI (Broadcast Music, Inc.) are private, independent organizations that are owned by their member songwriters and publishers. Congress has granted ASCAP and BMI the right to administer royalties for use of compositions. Almost every time a composition is performed - live, on the radio, television, internet or other media, the songwriter is entitled to a royalty for the use of the song, which is usually called a performance royalty or publishing royalty. (17 USC 106) So how does that work:

Songwriters usually sign with a music publisher (or can be their own music publisher), giving the music publisher the right to administer some or all of the songwriters compositions. Music publishing deals are historically 50/50 between the songwriter and music publisher, but there are many different types of deals.

The music publisher then associates with ASCAP or BMI and tells ASCAP or BMI what songs the music publisher controls and who the songwriters are. ASCAP and BMI issue a blanket license to the venues, bars, restaurants, radio, television, internet broadcasters for the use of the compositions in ASCAP and BMI's respective catalog. (A download is treated like a sale and does not generate a performance royalty. An internet stream is a performance and generates a royalty.) The blanket license fees are set by ASCAP and BMI, who consider the size of the audience, among other things, in setting the fees.

ASCAP and BMI then survey the number of performances of each composition. The songwriter gets paid for performance no matter who the recording artist is - Lennon/McCartney get paid a performance royalty when the Beatles recording of Help is performed and when the Deep Purple, Dolly Parton and Tina Turner recording of Help is performed. A fraction of a penny is paid for each performance of a composition. But with the huge number of venues, bars, restaurants, radio, television, internet broadcasters playing a popular song, the composition can generate a large amount of performance royalties. ASCAP and BMI then pay the music publisher who controls the composition. The music publisher then calculates the royalties owed among the compositions' songwriters (if more than one), and pays the songwriters their share. (Music publishers do other things also.)

Next time: How does a recording artist get paid when their recording gets played?

What Does Sound Exchange Do? by Craig Crafton

I've described how a song contains two different legal elements: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song. Whenever a song is performed a royalty is owed to the songwriter (or the songwriter's publisher) for the use of the underlying song or composition. ASCAP and BMI collect and administer that royalty.

So how does a recording artist get paid when the record performance gets played? Traditionally, when a sound recording gets played on the radio or in a business, no royalty is owed for the use of the sound recording. That is, the sound recording artist (the band) and its label do not get paid for the use (playing) of the sound recording. Only the songwriter gets paid a royalty for the use of the composition.

However, the Digital Performance in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 granted a performance right for sound recordings. But it only applies to digital transmissions - internet and satellite radio must pay the sound recording owner (label or band) for the performance of the sound recording.

Sound Exchange is a private, non-profit organization authorized to administer and collect the performance royalty for digital plays of the sound recording. Sound Exchange issues licenses to internet and satellite radio and collects a fee. Sound Exchange monitors play of songs on internet and satellite radio. Sound Exchange then pays the sound recording copyright owner (label), the performing artist (the band), and even featured performers, a royalty based on the number of plays a song receives. And although the royalty rate is fractional, many plays can add up to significant revenue.

Because the performance right for sound recordings only applies to digital transmission, traditional radio and businesses do not have to pay a royalty for use of the sound recordings they play. This was traditionally seen as good promotion for the artist. But most songs receive the majority of its play on traditional radio and in retail, restaurants, bars and clubs. A major war is going on in Congress between record labels and artists against corporate radio over the Performance Rights Act, which would apply the royalty for use of the sound recordings to traditional radio and others.

Next time: What is an ISRC and an ISWC?

What are ISRC and ISWC Codes? by Craig Crafton

I've talked about how ASCAP and BMI pay publishing royalties when a composition is publically performed. And that Sound Exchange is the organization that pays a digital performance royalty when a sound recording is played on internet or satellite radio. But, how do these organizations know when a song (composition and sound recording) has been played. Traditionally it was done by surveying and referring to music industry charts. But now technology is playing a big role.

When a song is played on the internet, satellite radio, and even traditional radio, that play is tracked by reference to a digitally encoded number in the metadata of the song. That is, a unique number that is given to a song, that is not seen or heard, but within the digital coding, and that can be identified and referneced electronically.

The digital reference systems becoming common in music are the ISRC and ISWC numbers.

ISRC means international standard recording code. ISRC numbers identify sound recordings. ISRC numbers allow radio stations and digital broadcasters to automatically credit a label or publisher with a play and download sales sites to track sells. An ISRC number can be thought of as being an electronically encoded bar code. You can get more information at http://fburls.com/92-1IApKURN/t/cid/650901/sid/116111008.

ISWC means international standard music work code. ISWC numbers identify musical works - the composition or underlying song. ISWC numbers are a unique and permanent reference number for the identification of musical works. ISWC numbers are used by to identify when a composition has been publically perofmed. For more information see http://fburls.com/99-3Vr1B98E/t/cid/650901/sid/116111008.

Use of ISRC and ISWC numbers is growing in importance. Songs without ISRC or ISWC numbers are much less likely to be credited for being played. Labels and artists should ensure that all versions of their sound recordings are properly coded. ISRC and ISWC coding is supported by most mastering software.

What is Copyright? by Craig Crafton

After a short break, I am back. In the next several issues of The Night Light, I intend to review the basics of copyright. Copyright is a creation of law, an ownership right created by Congress. Under the Copyright Act of 1976 artistic works created in the United States are given special rights and protections.

The copyright law protects: ... works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device... 17 U.S.C. § 102.

What this means is that that an artistic work must be fixed - that is written down, recorded, or somehow preserved outside the brain of its creator. When the artistic work is fixed, the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work. Because the artistic work must be fixed, copyright does not protect ideas or concepts. Copyright only protects the expression of ideas or concepts. For example, Johnny Cash's lyrics and melody to "Folsom Prison Blues" is copyrightable. But the idea of an imprisoned man longing for release is not.

The Copyright Act contains eight categories of artistic works that can be copyrighted:

  1. literary works;
  2. musical works, including any accompanying words;
  3. dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
  4. pantomimes and choreographic works;
  5. pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
  6. motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
  7. sound recordings, and
  8. architectural works.

In sum, copyright can be obtained for artistic works in those eight general categories. Copyright can be obtained when the artistic work is fixed, but not the mere idea or concept. And, the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work when it is fixed. Next time, what rights does copyright provide.

What are the Copyright Rights? by Craig Crafton

Last time we talked about how copyright can be obtained for artistic works, when the artistic work is fixed, but not the mere idea or concept, and the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work when it is fixed. But what rights does copyright provide?

Rights under a copyright are a creation of law, rights created by Congress. Section 106 of the Copyright Act gives six specific exclusive rights to a copyright owner:

  1. to reproduce the copyrighted work;
  2. to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
  3. to distribute copies of the copyrighted work to the public;
  4. to perform the copyrighted work publicly;
  5. to display the copyrighted work publicly; and
  6. for sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by a digital audio transmission.

Under the reproduction right, no one other than the copyright owner may make any copies of an artistic work. A derivative work is a work based upon a preexisting artistic works that is transformed, or adapted, such as transformation of a novel into a motion picture. Distribution is the right to make an artistic work available to the public for sale, rental, lease, or lending.

The public performance right allows a copyright owner to control when an artistic work is performed publicly. Public performance includes television and radio broadcasts. The public display right is similar to the public performance right. And the right to perform the copyrighted work publicly by a digital audio transmission made digital broadcasts similar to the public performance right.

These exclusive copyrights rights are different from the rights of a person who buys a copy of an artistic work. Buying a copy of an artistic work gives a property right in a copy, and the copy can be sold. But the buyer does not own any part of the copyright.

As an example, when a person purchases a song, on a compact disc or as a download, the person has received a property right in a copy of a copyrighted work (the song). The person buying the song does not receive any copyright rights when the person purchases the song. The copyright rights are held by the song's creators (writers and performers) until the song's creators specifically transfer them to a record label and/or music publisher.

The person who bought the song may not make copies of the song for distribution, because the right to reproduce and distribute the song are exclusive rights granted under the Copyright Act. But a copyright owner can sell copies of an artistic work, without giving up the copyright rights.

How Long Does a Copyright Last?

Copyright duration or term is a complicated question depending on when the work was created and whether the work has been published or registered, and when. Law on copyright duration was changed by the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998. As a brief overview:

For works created on or after January 1, 1978 (today for example) the term is the author's life, plus an additional 70 years after the author's death. For works co-authored, the copyright term is 70 years after the last surviving author's death. For works made for hire, anonymous and pseudonymous works the copyright duration is 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter.

For works created and published before 1978, the rules are complex and depend on whether the copyright has been renewed. Under the law in effect before 1978, a copyright lasted for a first term of 28 years from the date of copyright. A copyright could be renewed for an additional 28 years. If no renewal was filed, the work entered the public domain after the initial 28 years.

Now, for works published with a copyright notice between 1923 to 1963, and the copyright owner got a renewal, the work has a 95 year copyright term. For works published with a copyright notice between 1964 to 1977, a renewal is not needed, and the work automatically has a 95 year term.

For works created before 1978, but not published, with exceptions, the copyright term is life of the author plus 70 years, or 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, extending at least until December 31, 2002, whichever is longer. For works created before 1978, but published between January 1, 1978 and December 31, 2002, the copyright term is life of author plus 70 years or December 31, 2047, whichever is longer.

Lastly, the easiest Copyright duration rule is that for works registered or published prior to 1923 - the copyright has expired and all such works are in the public domain.

Because copyright duration is complicated, please consult a legal professional with any specific issues. Next time I will talk about transferring copyrights.


Craig Crafton worked in the music business as a musician, artist, producer, label and retail owner for fifteen years. Craig is Chair of the Dallas Bar Association Sports and Entertainment Law Section and serves as Associate Editor for the State Bar of Texas Sports and Entertainment Law Section journal. In 2008 he organized How to Make Money in Music, where he presented on Music Publishing and Royalties discussing evolving rights in digital royalties. Craig was a panelist at the 2007 Winter Music Conference and presented at the 2006 Dallas Music Partners Conference and 2009 Texas Independent Music Expo. Among his clients, Craig has represented apparel designers, video game creators and radio personalities in trademark matters, musicians, bands, labels, publishers, athletes and sports managers, film producers, magazine publishers and art galleries in contract disputes, negotiations and business entity formation. Mr. Crafton's combination of entertainment business experience as a performer and creator and legal training provides a unique and insightful perspective. He currently operates a music label and 3345 Music Publishing. See cozen.com for information about contacting Mr. Crafton.

These Articles are for Information Purposes Only and are Not Legal Advice. Used by permission.

Dallas Entertainment Lawyer Craig Crafton has graciously allowed us to reprint his articles about copyright issues. These should be of great benefit to our songwriters, composers, and musicians. There's more info about Craig at the bottom of the page.

How to Register a Copyright by Craig Crafton

We've recently discussed what a copyright is and when it is created, and what rights a copyright provides. But how do you register a copyright?

You register a copyright at http://www.copyright.gov/. That is the US Copyright Office website. There is no other website where you can personally register a copyright. Registration is $35 per submission (for songs a submission can be up to 80 minutes of songs by the same songwriters). Paper submission is now an $80 fee. All other websites are other companies trying to make money off you.

The copyright.gov website contains much good information that can be overwhelming and the registration interface is good, but still somewhat confusing. After completing the online registration form you can either upload or mail to the US Copyright Office a copy of the artist work being copyrighted, such as a cd or manuscript. For songs, the composition (PA copyright) and sound recording (SR copyright) can be done together, for one fee, or separately if the songwriter and recording artist are different.

Copyright registration serves two important purposes. The first is to establish a verifiable record of the date and content of an artistic work. Once the copyright of an artistic work is registered there is an official government record, that carries a presumption of accurateness, regarding when you created the artistic work.

The second reason is that copyright registration entitles the copyright holder of statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement in cases of copyright violation. In the case your artistic work is misappropriated the chance of recovery of substantial damages are much greater if the artistic work is formally copyrighted.

Remember, the registration of the copyright is not the same as the creation of the copyright. The registration is a formal method to put the world on notice of your copyright and secure the right to damages if your copyright is violated.

What about the poor-mans copyright - mailing a copy of your artistic work to someone who keeps the envelop sealed? It is not the same as registration. It may be evidence of a date of creation, based on the post-mark, but is not a verifiable government record. There is no notice to the world of your copyright. And most importantly, you would not be entitled to the statutory damages, but much lower common-law damages.

Next time I will discuss the duration of a copyright.

What is a Controlled Composition Clause? by Craig Crafton

Mechanical Royalties are moneys a songwriter receives when another artist records their song. But what happens to Mechanical Royalties when you record your own songs? If you are recording a song that you wrote, your label owes a Mechanical Royalty to your publisher for the use of the underlying song in a recording. However, almost all record companies include a contract clause called a "controlled composition clause" that reduces the Mechanical Royalty owed to 3/4 or 75% of the statutory rate.

A controlled composition is a song written, owned or controlled by the artist. A controlled composition clause reduces the Mechanical Royalty for a songwriter/ recording artist and its publisher on songs written or "controlled" by the artist. A controlled composition clause reduces the payment per song and limits the total number of songs on which Mechanical Royalties will be paid. The purpose of a controlled composition clause is to limit on how much a label pays as a Mechanical Royalty for each controlled composition.

How it works is a typical controlled composition clause that says the songwriter/artist will receive 3/4 of the minimum statutory mechanical rate payable on a maximum of 10 songs per album. Therefore, the Mechanical Royalty on the artist's entire album has a cap of $0.60 cents (3/4 rate x 10 songs). If the songwriter/artist writes 12 songs for the album, the artist's Mechanical Royalty share is $0.60 cents instead of $0.96 cents at the full rate.

Artists should attempt to negotiate a favorable rate under a controlled composition clause. Record companies bear the high cost and risk recording, marketing and developing songwriter/ recording artists and contend that artists should give them a break on the Mechanical Royalty the labels pay.

Next we take a look at music licensing for film and television and the synchronization license.

Who is Harry Fox? by Craig Crafton

Last time I discussed how Mechanical Royalties are moneys a songwriter receives when another artist records their song. When an underlying song (composition) is recorded and reproduced a Mechanical Royalty is owed to the owner of the underlying song (publisher and/or songwriter) for the use of the underlying song. The Mechanical Royalty is typically paid by the record label to the song writer or publisher for use of the underlying song in a recording. The same mechanical royalty applies for digital downloads (internet) or physical (cd or album) reproductions of a song.

If you are recording a song that you wrote, your label owes a Mechanical Royalty to your publisher (more on this in the next issue). If you record a cover version of a song that has already been recorded, you or your label must obtain a mechanical license and pay a Mechanical Royalty to the publisher/songwriter of the underling song.

Harry Fox Agency is a private company that issues mechanical licenses and collects mechanical royalties. Publishers or songwriters sign up with Harry Fox Agency. When a recording artist wants to record a song represented by Harry Fox Agency, the artist or label contacts Harry Fox Agency, who issues the mechanical license. The Harry Fox Agency then collects the Mechanical Royalty, for the use of the underlying song, and pays the publisher or songwriter.

That is how a songwriter gets paid for the use of his/her song when it is recorded. The Harry Fox Agency coordinates issuing Mechanical Licenses and collecting Mechanical Royalties. To record a song not listed with the Harry Fox Agency, a recording artist must contact the publisher or songwriter directly and obtain a mechanical license.

In the next Night Light newsletter I talk about what happens with Mechanical Royalties when you record your own songs.

How Does a Songwriter Get Paid When His/Her Song is Recorded? by Craig Crafton

Last time I discussed "what is a song" and explained that a song contains two distinct legal parts: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song.

The underlying song is notes on a page of written music, the composition or that thing created by the songwriter. There can be only one underlying song or composition. Every time an underlying song is performed the songwriter is entitled to a royalty, which is called a performance royalty or publishing royalty, typically collected by ASCAP or BMI, usually through a publisher who pays the songwriter. The recorded performance of the song is usually owned by the person paying for the recording - typically he label - who pays the performing artist a royalty based on sales of the recording. There can be many recorded performances an underlying song.

So how does a songwriter get paid for the use of his/her song when it is recorded by artists? This is the often misunderstood Mechanical Royalty. A bit of history: Before recorded music, in the early 1900s songs got popular on the vaudeville circuit. Musicians would buy the sheet music to perform songs. The sheet music was published by music publishers, who then paid the songwriter a percentage of the sheet music sales. Then player pianos were invented. Player pianos used a thick piece of paper punched with notches that caused the piano keys to play the song - a mechanical process. Live piano players were no longer necessary and sheet music wasn't being sold as much.

But the underlying song was being reproduced or performed by the piano scrolls used by player pianos. The publishers lobbied Congress and the Mechanical Royalty was created. The Mechanical Royalty was a royalty that the manufacturers of the piano scrolls were obligated to pay to publishers for use of the underlying song. When albums and tapes were invented, the mechanical royalty was extended to those formats, which were also mechanical reproductions (a needle in a groove and electrical current from tape to tape head). When cds were invented there was no mechanical process involved (only digital code), but in the 1980s, after much debate, the mechanical royalty was extended to cds. And the same thing happened with digital downloads.

When an underlying song is recorded and reproduced, in any format, a Mechanical Royalty is owed to the owner of the underlying song (publisher and/or songwriter) for the use of the underlying song. The Mechanical Royalty is typically paid by the record label to the song writer or publisher for use of the underlying song in a recording.

The amount of the mechanical royalty has increased over time and is now $.091 for songs 5 minutes or less, based on each recorded copy of the song. (17 US Code 115). The same mechanical royalty applies for digital downloads (internet) or physical (cd or album) reproductions of a song.

The Mechanical Royalty is somewhat difficult to grasp, but first understanding the different rights and royalties for an underlying song or composition and a recorded performance of a song is the first step. This is just a basic outline. Over the next several Night Light newsletters I will address more about Mechanical Royalties and other royalties that can provide revenue to songwriters, publishers and recordings artists.

What is A Song? by Craig Crafton

Music and lyrics? Melody and harmony? Rhythm and groove? Yes to all. But legally a song contains two distinct elements that implicate different rights, different royalties and different revenue streams. The two parts of a song are: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song.

There can be many recordings of a song, but only one underlying song or composition. For example, the song Help was written by Lennon/McCartney - they are the only songwriters and only Lennon/McCartney (or their publisher) will always own the underlying song or composition. However, there can be many recorded performances of Help by many bands, including the Beatles.

The underlying song is embodied by the notes on a page of written music but exists in a more metaphysical sense as the thing created by the songwriter. The underlying song is copyrighted by a form PA, which means performing arts. Every time the underlying song is performed, live on the radio, television, internet or other media, the songwriter is entitled to a royalty for the use of the song, which is called a performance royalty or publishing royalty. (17 USC 106) The performance or publishing royalty is typically collected by ASCAP or BMI, usually through a publisher who pays the songwriter.

The recorded performance of a song is a different copyright and different royalty. Unlike the underlying song, there can be many recorded performances of Help by many bands, including the Beatles. The recorded performance of the song is usually owned by the person paying for the recording - a music label or the recording artist if no label. The label pays the artist who records the song a royalty based on the sales of the recording, called a sales royalty or artist royalty. The amount of the sales or artist royalty is negotiated between the label and artist. A recorded performance is copyrighted on a form SR, which stands for Sound Recording.

That is just the basics. But the distinction between the underlying sound and recorded performance is the key to kinds of royalties that are paid, who pays, and who receives. Over the next several Night Light newsletters I will discuss these royalties and begin to paint a picture where the art, business and law of music combine.

Music in Movies, TV and Advertisements by Craig Crafton

Any time music is used in a movie, tv or advertisement two licenses are required:

Synchronization (synch) License: This license must be obtained from the songwriter or publisher (if the writer has assigned his/her rights to a publisher) of the composition. A Synch License gives the movie or tv producer the right to synchronize the composition (not the recording of the song, but the underlying composition - lyrics and melody) with the moving images in the movie, tv show or advertisement. The fee for a Synch License is negotiated between the movie or tv producer and the songwriter/publisher.

M aster Use License: The movie or tv producer also must obtain a license from the person that owns the copyright to the sound recording (found on a CD or download). Typically, a record label owns the sound recording copyright and thus holds the master use rights. If there is no label, the recording artist usually owns the master use right. The fee for a Master Use License is negotiated between the movie or tv producer and the label/recording artist.

So, for an artist/songwriter who has not assigned their publishing rights and self-releases their own record (without a label), the movie or tv producer negotiates "both sides" - the Synch License and Master Use License - with the artist/songwriter directly. If the artist has a publisher and a record deal, the movie or tv producer negotiates with the publisher for the Synch License and the label for the Master Use License. Either the label or the publisher/songwriter can refuse to grant a license and the recorded song then cannot be used.

The license fees paid by movie or tv producers is typically split between the publisher/songwriter for the synch rights and the label/recording artist for the master use rights. When the movie, tv show or advertisement containing the licensed song is publicly performed (broadcast on tv), a performance royalty is generated for the publisher/songwriter, typically collected by ASCAP or BMI. There is no performance royalty from public performance in movie theaters.

What do ASCAP and BMI do? by Craig Crafton

As we have talked about before, a song contains two distinct legal elements that implicate different rights, different royalties and different revenue streams: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song. The composition is embodied by the notes on a page of written music but exists in a more metaphysical sense as the thing created by the songwriter. There can be many recordings of a song, but only one composition. ASCAP and BMI are only concerned with the composition, and the rights, royalties and revenue generated by use (performance) of the composition.

ASCAP (American Society of Composers Arrangers and Producers) and BMI (Broadcast Music, Inc.) are private, independent organizations that are owned by their member songwriters and publishers. Congress has granted ASCAP and BMI the right to administer royalties for use of compositions. Almost every time a composition is performed - live, on the radio, television, internet or other media, the songwriter is entitled to a royalty for the use of the song, which is usually called a performance royalty or publishing royalty. (17 USC 106) So how does that work:

Songwriters usually sign with a music publisher (or can be their own music publisher), giving the music publisher the right to administer some or all of the songwriters compositions. Music publishing deals are historically 50/50 between the songwriter and music publisher, but there are many different types of deals.

The music publisher then associates with ASCAP or BMI and tells ASCAP or BMI what songs the music publisher controls and who the songwriters are. ASCAP and BMI issue a blanket license to the venues, bars, restaurants, radio, television, internet broadcasters for the use of the compositions in ASCAP and BMI's respective catalog. (A download is treated like a sale and does not generate a performance royalty. An internet stream is a performance and generates a royalty.) The blanket license fees are set by ASCAP and BMI, who consider the size of the audience, among other things, in setting the fees.

ASCAP and BMI then survey the number of performances of each composition. The songwriter gets paid for performance no matter who the recording artist is - Lennon/McCartney get paid a performance royalty when the Beatles recording of Help is performed and when the Deep Purple, Dolly Parton and Tina Turner recording of Help is performed. A fraction of a penny is paid for each performance of a composition. But with the huge number of venues, bars, restaurants, radio, television, internet broadcasters playing a popular song, the composition can generate a large amount of performance royalties. ASCAP and BMI then pay the music publisher who controls the composition. The music publisher then calculates the royalties owed among the compositions' songwriters (if more than one), and pays the songwriters their share. (Music publishers do other things also.)

Next time: How does a recording artist get paid when their recording gets played?

What Does Sound Exchange Do? by Craig Crafton

I've described how a song contains two different legal elements: 1) the underlying song or composition; and 2) the recorded performance of the song. Whenever a song is performed a royalty is owed to the songwriter (or the songwriter's publisher) for the use of the underlying song or composition. ASCAP and BMI collect and administer that royalty.

So how does a recording artist get paid when the record performance gets played? Traditionally, when a sound recording gets played on the radio or in a business, no royalty is owed for the use of the sound recording. That is, the sound recording artist (the band) and its label do not get paid for the use (playing) of the sound recording. Only the songwriter gets paid a royalty for the use of the composition.

However, the Digital Performance in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 granted a performance right for sound recordings. But it only applies to digital transmissions - internet and satellite radio must pay the sound recording owner (label or band) for the performance of the sound recording.

Sound Exchange is a private, non-profit organization authorized to administer and collect the performance royalty for digital plays of the sound recording. Sound Exchange issues licenses to internet and satellite radio and collects a fee. Sound Exchange monitors play of songs on internet and satellite radio. Sound Exchange then pays the sound recording copyright owner (label), the performing artist (the band), and even featured performers, a royalty based on the number of plays a song receives. And although the royalty rate is fractional, many plays can add up to significant revenue.

Because the performance right for sound recordings only applies to digital transmission, traditional radio and businesses do not have to pay a royalty for use of the sound recordings they play. This was traditionally seen as good promotion for the artist. But most songs receive the majority of its play on traditional radio and in retail, restaurants, bars and clubs. A major war is going on in Congress between record labels and artists against corporate radio over the Performance Rights Act, which would apply the royalty for use of the sound recordings to traditional radio and others.

Next time: What is an ISRC and an ISWC?

What are ISRC and ISWC Codes? by Craig Crafton

I've talked about how ASCAP and BMI pay publishing royalties when a composition is publically performed. And that Sound Exchange is the organization that pays a digital performance royalty when a sound recording is played on internet or satellite radio. But, how do these organizations know when a song (composition and sound recording) has been played. Traditionally it was done by surveying and referring to music industry charts. But now technology is playing a big role.

When a song is played on the internet, satellite radio, and even traditional radio, that play is tracked by reference to a digitally encoded number in the metadata of the song. That is, a unique number that is given to a song, that is not seen or heard, but within the digital coding, and that can be identified and referneced electronically.

The digital reference systems becoming common in music are the ISRC and ISWC numbers.

ISRC means international standard recording code. ISRC numbers identify sound recordings. ISRC numbers allow radio stations and digital broadcasters to automatically credit a label or publisher with a play and download sales sites to track sells. An ISRC number can be thought of as being an electronically encoded bar code. You can get more information at http://fburls.com/92-1IApKURN/t/cid/650901/sid/116111008.

ISWC means international standard music work code. ISWC numbers identify musical works - the composition or underlying song. ISWC numbers are a unique and permanent reference number for the identification of musical works. ISWC numbers are used by to identify when a composition has been publically perofmed. For more information see http://fburls.com/99-3Vr1B98E/t/cid/650901/sid/116111008.

Use of ISRC and ISWC numbers is growing in importance. Songs without ISRC or ISWC numbers are much less likely to be credited for being played. Labels and artists should ensure that all versions of their sound recordings are properly coded. ISRC and ISWC coding is supported by most mastering software.

What is Copyright? by Craig Crafton

After a short break, I am back. In the next several issues of The Night Light, I intend to review the basics of copyright. Copyright is a creation of law, an ownership right created by Congress. Under the Copyright Act of 1976 artistic works created in the United States are given special rights and protections.

The copyright law protects: ... works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device... 17 U.S.C. § 102.

What this means is that that an artistic work must be fixed - that is written down, recorded, or somehow preserved outside the brain of its creator. When the artistic work is fixed, the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work. Because the artistic work must be fixed, copyright does not protect ideas or concepts. Copyright only protects the expression of ideas or concepts. For example, Johnny Cash's lyrics and melody to "Folsom Prison Blues" is copyrightable. But the idea of an imprisoned man longing for release is not.

The Copyright Act contains eight categories of artistic works that can be copyrighted:

  1. literary works;
  2. musical works, including any accompanying words;
  3. dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
  4. pantomimes and choreographic works;
  5. pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
  6. motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
  7. sound recordings, and
  8. architectural works.

In sum, copyright can be obtained for artistic works in those eight general categories. Copyright can be obtained when the artistic work is fixed, but not the mere idea or concept. And, the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work when it is fixed. Next time, what rights does copyright provide.

What are the Copyright Rights? by Craig Crafton

Last time we talked about how copyright can be obtained for artistic works, when the artistic work is fixed, but not the mere idea or concept, and the creator owns the copyright in the artistic work when it is fixed. But what rights does copyright provide?

Rights under a copyright are a creation of law, rights created by Congress. Section 106 of the Copyright Act gives six specific exclusive rights to a copyright owner:

  1. to reproduce the copyrighted work;
  2. to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
  3. to distribute copies of the copyrighted work to the public;
  4. to perform the copyrighted work publicly;
  5. to display the copyrighted work publicly; and
  6. for sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by a digital audio transmission.

Under the reproduction right, no one other than the copyright owner may make any copies of an artistic work. A derivative work is a work based upon a preexisting artistic works that is transformed, or adapted, such as transformation of a novel into a motion picture. Distribution is the right to make an artistic work available to the public for sale, rental, lease, or lending.

The public performance right allows a copyright owner to control when an artistic work is performed publicly. Public performance includes television and radio broadcasts. The public display right is similar to the public performance right. And the right to perform the copyrighted work publicly by a digital audio transmission made digital broadcasts similar to the public performance right.

These exclusive copyrights rights are different from the rights of a person who buys a copy of an artistic work. Buying a copy of an artistic work gives a property right in a copy, and the copy can be sold. But the buyer does not own any part of the copyright.

As an example, when a person purchases a song, on a compact disc or as a download, the person has received a property right in a copy of a copyrighted work (the song). The person buying the song does not receive any copyright rights when the person purchases the song. The copyright rights are held by the song's creators (writers and performers) until the song's creators specifically transfer them to a record label and/or music publisher.

The person who bought the song may not make copies of the song for distribution, because the right to reproduce and distribute the song are exclusive rights granted under the Copyright Act. But a copyright owner can sell copies of an artistic work, without giving up the copyright rights.

How Long Does a Copyright Last?

Copyright duration or term is a complicated question depending on when the work was created and whether the work has been published or registered, and when. Law on copyright duration was changed by the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998. As a brief overview:

For works created on or after January 1, 1978 (today for example) the term is the author's life, plus an additional 70 years after the author's death. For works co-authored, the copyright term is 70 years after the last surviving author's death. For works made for hire, anonymous and pseudonymous works the copyright duration is 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter.

For works created and published before 1978, the rules are complex and depend on whether the copyright has been renewed. Under the law in effect before 1978, a copyright lasted for a first term of 28 years from the date of copyright. A copyright could be renewed for an additional 28 years. If no renewal was filed, the work entered the public domain after the initial 28 years.

Now, for works published with a copyright notice between 1923 to 1963, and the copyright owner got a renewal, the work has a 95 year copyright term. For works published with a copyright notice between 1964 to 1977, a renewal is not needed, and the work automatically has a 95 year term.

For works created before 1978, but not published, with exceptions, the copyright term is life of the author plus 70 years, or 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, extending at least until December 31, 2002, whichever is longer. For works created before 1978, but published between January 1, 1978 and December 31, 2002, the copyright term is life of author plus 70 years or December 31, 2047, whichever is longer.

Lastly, the easiest Copyright duration rule is that for works registered or published prior to 1923 - the copyright has expired and all such works are in the public domain.

Because copyright duration is complicated, please consult a legal professional with any specific issues. Next time I will talk about transferring copyrights.


Craig Crafton worked in the music business as a musician, artist, producer, label and retail owner for fifteen years. Craig is Chair of the Dallas Bar Association Sports and Entertainment Law Section and serves as Associate Editor for the State Bar of Texas Sports and Entertainment Law Section journal. In 2008 he organized How to Make Money in Music, where he presented on Music Publishing and Royalties discussing evolving rights in digital royalties. Craig was a panelist at the 2007 Winter Music Conference and presented at the 2006 Dallas Music Partners Conference and 2009 Texas Independent Music Expo. Among his clients, Craig has represented apparel designers, video game creators and radio personalities in trademark matters, musicians, bands, labels, publishers, athletes and sports managers, film producers, magazine publishers and art galleries in contract disputes, negotiations and business entity formation. Mr. Crafton's combination of entertainment business experience as a performer and creator and legal training provides a unique and insightful perspective. He currently operates a music label and 3345 Music Publishing. See cozen.com for information about contacting Mr. Crafton.

These Articles are for Information Purposes Only and are Not Legal Advice. Used by permission.

Why Choose Promethean Studios?

  • You’ll love your lessons and have a blast while you learn.

  • You can learn online, in the studio, or in a band.

  • You get to play or sing the music you love while you develop skills.

  • Your instructor is one of the nation’s top private music educators and musicians.

  • All lessons are customized to your goals, your music, your abilities, and your personality – how YOU learn.

  • Over 5000 students from around the world have taken the finest private lessons in the world right here.

  • You’ll learn more quickly and save years of wasted effort because we’ll identify and solve key errors in your technique as you develop essential skills.

  • We teach complete beginners through studio professionals so there’s never a limit to your learning potential.

  • 99.9% of students can learn to play or sing better than they ever imagined. That’s you, buddy.

Contact Us Today!

Fun and Excellence Starts at Promethean Studios
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.